Taiwan defense survey finds trust pillars eroding, not collapse
This digest was compiled by AI from multiple sources — links to the originals are below.
A two-wave Taiwan National Security Survey of 2,745 respondents in June 2024 and September 2025 shows declining trust in government, fellow citizens, and military effectiveness. The findings challenge both pessimistic claims that Taiwan will give up and optimistic assertions of unwavering resolve. The erosion is uneven across demographic groups and trust pillars.
Key Facts
- The Taiwan National Security Survey polled 2,745 respondents in June 2024 and September 2025.
- The survey measures three pillars of a 'Defense Social Contract': trust in the state, trust in fellow citizens, and trust that resistance can work.
- The author argues that willingness-to-fight polling captures sentiment, not the conditions for sacrifice.
- The survey's two waves allow tracking change over time and disaggregating by demographic group.
Defense Social Contract Framework
The author proposes that citizens accept war risks only under a 'Defense Social Contract' resting on three pillars. The first pillar is trust in the state, requiring belief in competent and fair governance. The second pillar is trust in fellow citizens, demanding shared burden and common cause across political camps. The third pillar is trust that resistance can work, including confidence in military capability and timely allied support. If any pillar fails, professed willingness to fight remains sentiment rather than action.
Survey Methodology and Timing
The analysis uses two nationally representative waves of the Taiwan National Security Survey. The waves were fielded in June 2024 and September 2025, totaling 2,745 respondents. The two-wave design enables tracking change over time and disaggregating results by demographic group. The author emphasizes that the timing of the waves is significant for interpreting trends.
1 source
Time · lag behind first